P
ProveIQ
Economics

Vendor consolidation is procurement's favourite pitch.

You're paying 4 ATSes × ₹per-seat + 2 job boards × ₹per-seat + 1 BGV vendor × ₹per-hire. ProveIQ's per-verification pricing replaces the search-seat spend and bridges into all 4 ATSes. The math is published.

Three GCC shapes, one honest anchor.

50 recruiters

2,500 hires/yr · GCC-small

Incumbent mix
Naukri 50 × ₹15K × 12 + LinkedIn 50 × ₹14K × 12 + BGV ₹1,500/hire × 2,500
≈ ₹2.14 Cr / yr
ProveIQ
Custom verification pack (≈ ₹79 × 2,500 = ₹1.98L) + ATS bridge (free in pack) + DPDP playbook
ProveIQ total
≈ ₹8-12L / yr + ATS bridge custom

200 recruiters

10,000 hires/yr · GCC-mid

Incumbent mix
Naukri + LinkedIn per-seat + BGV per-hire + job-board mix at 200-recruiter volume
≈ ₹8.5 Cr / yr
ProveIQ
Custom verification pack scaled to 10,000 hires + ATS bridge + enterprise analytics + DPDP playbook
ProveIQ total
≈ ₹30-45L / yr

500 recruiters

25,000 hires/yr · GCC-large

Incumbent mix
Naukri + LinkedIn per-seat sprawl + BGV per-hire + job-board mix + 4-ATS licenses at 500-recruiter volume
≈ ₹21 Cr / yr
ProveIQ
Custom verification pack scaled to 25,000 hires + ATS bridge + analytics + dedicated CSM + DPDP playbook
ProveIQ total
≈ ₹75L - 1.2 Cr / yr

Custom = multi-year pack rate negotiated. Published per-verification anchor rate is ₹79 at 500-credit volume (CO-025). Signing day price always has a per-verification anchor.

Vendor consolidation, line by line.

The goal isn't to rip out the ATS you already pay for. It's to replace the per-seat search and BGV lines with one per-verification layer that bridges into every ATS you already run.

Before · the incumbent mix
  • Naukri Recruiter seats (per-seat, per-month)
  • LinkedIn Recruiter seats (per-seat, per-month)
  • Greenhouse license
  • Lever license
  • Freshteam license
  • Keka Hire license
  • BGV vendor (per-hire)
  • Job boards + long-tail sourcing seats
After · the ProveIQ layer
  • Existing ATS stack (unchanged — you keep what works)
  • ProveIQ as the verification layer bridged into all of them

Every ATS you keep. Every verification you run flows through one bridge with one audit log and one DPDP posture.

Why not per-seat at GCC scale?

Per-seat access scales linearly with headcount.

Verification is a cost centre — it should scale with hires closed, not seats bought. Per-seat math does not survive CFO review at GCC scale.

Per-seat vendors have zero marginal cost on seat #51.

The price is rent, not value. On seat #151 it is still rent. Procurement math cannot justify that delta.

Per-verification pricing aligns vendor incentives with hiring outcomes.

Fewer ghost seats. Fewer dormant accounts. Fewer line items the CFO asks about each quarter.

The published anchor (CO-025).

Every custom enterprise quote includes a published per-verification anchor rate. You will never receive a “custom — call sales” quote without an anchor number. This is constitutional (CO-025), not negotiable.

See the pricing packs + SLA tiers.

Custom packs with published anchor rate. SLA tiers. Security add-ons. No hard demo wall.

See pricingFAQ